|
other
pages |
|
|
|
|
Internet pages open source | content management systems anatomy of a
web page | hand-coding your first HTML page this page What is the Internet? | How Did the Internet Begin? | What Trends Drive the Development of the Internet? |
If I asked you to draw a picture of the Internet, what would you put on the piece of paper?
You already have a mental model of what the
Internet is and how it works, and much of that mental model is
accurate. The purpose of this section of our course web is to confirm
and extend what you know and have experienced online, that is, to
help you have a more accurate mental
model.
What you gain
The ability to more quickly and
accurately understand and adapt to change; that is, the ability to lead
people into the future. Move leftwards on the adoption curve. Learn new technologies more quickly. Predict
the future better, for example, make better investment decisions.
The ability to talk to the experts who are the architects, engineers, and carpenters of your online experience.
A Surge in Learning the Language of the Internet
by Jenna Wortham
NY Times, March 27, 2012
Example
Had you bought Google's stock or Amazon's stock when it was first issued, you would have made a good investment. But who knew? Knowing what the Internet is and how it works would increase the chances that it is you who will know.
Test yourself
When
is the computer that you're using connected to other computers?
When connected,
what information is passing over that connection?
Is that
information protected from eavesdropping and alteration?
What can you
know about the other sites or persons you're connected to?
What can they
know about you?
|
Slogans and Mantras |

It's stupid. In fact, it's so stupid that it's not even a thing. Let me repeat that: There is no such thing as the Internet. That's why it works so well.
The old-fashioned landline analog voice telephone
network has all the intelligence inside the network -- the phone
company's central switching offices. The telephone network is stupid at
the edges; you couldn't do much with old-fashioned telephone unless you
added on an
answering machine that was not part of the network.
In contrast, the digital data network, aka the Internet, has all the intelligence
at the edges, your
PC or phone or tablet. It's stupid in the middle, just a bit conveyor.
Millions of
computers act as routers, moving packets of bits on to the next
computer as the packets make their way to their destination. There is
no center, no Internet, Inc. running everything.
Rise of
the Stupid Network
by David Isenberg
The Internet is more a cluster of
innovations that share three virtues. It is a not a single
innovation or a definable thing.
World of Ends: What the
Internet Is and How to Stop Mistaking It for Something Else
by Doc Searls and David Weinberger
They can own and control and legislate and get profit from a thing. It's hard to own and control let alone legislate a virtue.
I would add a fourth virtue: the Internet is constructed to route around damage. If a company or government tries to own the Internet, to keep people from using it and improving it, they just get ignored and the rest of us go about our business.
As a result, politically, it's an anarchy.
In theory, maintaining the end-to-end principle, it's the open system that carries IP packets from source IP addresses to destination IP addresses.
|
In technical terms, it runs on algorithms. In social terms, it's similar to the town commons, the plot of land set aside for everyone to use. The common wealth is a similar concept. I own a piece of land. Do I own the air above that land? Certainly as high as I can reach, as high as my rooftop. How far above?
At some point, it becomes public space again, and
airplanes can fly over your house without asking permission.
This collaboration is also based on technical standards. In addition to the larger standards for electricity and electrical devices, which usually cost money, the Internet runs on protocols and computer languages that are free and shared by everyone, just as the grass and trees in the town commons are free or the alphabet is free. These protocols are overseen by a couple of self-appointed deliberative committees that have established processes for orderly change -- the antidote to anarchy and to the greed it could breed.
Why do we have the Internet in the first place?
During the cold war in the 1950's, the U.S. military had a problem. What if the Russians bombed the center? As another example, the new interstate highway system was great, but there were only a couple of bridges over the Mississippi River. If the Russians bombed the bridge, the fancy highway system on either bank wasn't worth much.
The military relied on the telephone system to communicate. It uses the tin can model, you know, two tin cans with a string between. The farther away the tin cans, the louder you need to shout. Snip the string and the circuit is broken and the communication is over. It used to happen on Mother's Day, when "all circuits are busy. Please try your call again later." Faced with the Russian bomb, the U.S. military could not armor-plate, protect, or otherwise secure every telephone pole and wire in the country.
Paul Baran of
the RAND
Institute proposed in 1964 a whole new
way of
thinking about networks in his report called "On Distributed
Communications: 1. Introduction to Distributed Communications Network".
Instead of circuits, he proposed packets. Instead of a network with a
center (on
the left), he proposed a network without a center (on the right), what
he called
a distributed network.
Bruce Sterling explains the principles in his Short History of the Internet.
To remove a possible means of enemy spying, the
network's nodes
would retain no information about the traffic passing through. Sterling
goes on
to use Baran's hot-potato analogy:
It took another twenty years for the widespread adoption of the rules, or the protocol, that made Baran's vision a reality. These rules are technical rules, not social or political or commercial rules. It turned out that the rules that avoided enemy spying in war time also work against their peace time equivalents: censorship and control. The powerful people at the top of social, political, and commercial organizations such as libraries, governments, and music distribution companies would like to maintain control. Note they always call it something else. Librarians call it access. Governments call it securing state secrets. Record labels call it copyrights. However, the genie is out of the bottle and it isn't going back in.
In short, hyperlinks subvert hierarchy.
Who owns the Internet? No one does. Everyone does. As a packet-switched
network, it started in the fall of 1969 with four computers linked
together
because academic researchers like Douglas
Engelbart
(above) at Stanford were curious about augmenting human
intelligence,
especially accurate memory. They cooperated for the common good.
Engelbart not only envisioned and explained the internet back in 1968
before it existed, but he also did practical things like invent the
mouse. That's the first one in the photo above - over forty years ago!
|
The ARPA Network 1969 Node 1 University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) August Node 2 Stanford (California) Research Institute (SRI) October Node 3 University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB) November Node 4 University of Utah December
from the original back-of-the-envelope sketch on the left |
source: Brief
History of the Domain Name System
Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Nothing much has changed except the number of computers and the technical rules, called protocols, by which the information is exchanged.
These are long-term trends. You can count on them
continuing, which will help you place long-term bets -- like which
investment of yourtime (your job) and money offers you the better
future?
Increasingly, computers are becoming, in order of power of the trend, as I see it, most powerful first:
Moore's Law: about every two years, computers double in power and halve in price.
On the left, we see this pattern demonstrated by the number of transistors on a given
area or chip. Many other measures, such as pixels per dollar, show the
same pattern because they are demonstrating the same "law". (It's
really just a pattern that has continued for decades.)
Note that the x-axis is linear but the y-axis is
logarithmic. Time on the x-axis increases a year at a time. However,
number of transistors on the y-axis increases exponentially.
What you can do on your iPhone today (Why is it even called a
"phone"?) took t
housands of dollars of hardware and a corner of a room
just fifteen years ago. And you couldn't take it with you when you left
the house. Soon your belt buckle will do more than Windows does now.
For example, tou
will be able to walk up to any flat screen and go to the personal web
site of
anyone you recently stood near.
For almost the last decade, the best a US household could buy was the telephone company's DSL downstream bandwidth of 3 Mbps. In South Korea, the current world-wide leader in bandwidth to the home, they get 12 Mbps.
update Dec 3 - The above info is outdated. Below are the OECD (Org of Economically Developed Countries) Broadband Portal's statistics for September 2010. Click to enlarge.
| Average advertised broadband download speed, by country, kbit/s |
price for low-bandwidth access |
price for high-bandwidth access |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On the graph on the left, you can see that the U.S. companies aren't offering much bandwidth, on average, compared to companies in other countries. Well, perhaps in those other countries they pay a whole lot more.
On the graph in the center, you can see that Internet users in other developed countries pay about what Internet users in the U.S. pay for the low-bandwidth access that U.S. consumers can get. But most of the foreigner are choosing the high-bandwidth access, of course, so how much are they paying for that?
Using Japan as an example, you can see on the left-hand chart Japan's average advertised broadband download speed is about 80 Mbps and the U.S.'s 14 Mbps. On the center graph for connections below 2.5, which is what you are getting at home, as opposed to what Medaille gets coming onto campus for the whole campus, Japan $24 and U.S. $26, about the same. For the high-bandwidth connections, Japan $31, a little higher than the low-bandwidth. For the U.S., $122, about four times higher, and it's not offered to the home.
On December 4, 2011, I went to Verizon.com and inquired
about bandwidth and prices to my home in Buffalo. I can't provide a
direct URL because I had to fill out forms in pop-up windows, but I was
offered "High Speed Internet
Enhanced 1.1 to 3 Mbps $39.99 per month". That's the best I can
get. In Japan, according to the OECC averages, I would pay a little
more, $40 instead of $30, for a whole lot less, 3 Mbps instead of 80 Mbps.
What would you do with gigabit internet speeds?
by Richard Taylor and Alex Hudson
BBC, October 15, 2010
1,000 Mbps? Forget that! The Internet2 backbone
has bandwidth of 100 Gbps or
100,000 Mbps. That's over 30,000 times greater than what we can get at
home now. The Internet2 network is up and running and thousands of people are using it every day, but not at home.
Is Internet2 using a different physical network? No, they're using fiber that is already in the ground. Through Fiberco, they're using dark fiber from Level 3. Why aren't we getting that at home?
Do we really need that much bandwidth? What are we going to do with all that data?
The Age of Big Data
By Steve Lohr
NY Times, February 11, 2012
IBM Smarter Planet's Internet of Things
The Read/Write Web - YouTube channel
World Economic Forum's Big Data, Big Impact: New Possibilities for International Development
broadband multimedia; streaming media; two-way streaming media; interactive two-way video
gone: traditional TV and radio broadcast, local stations
every minute, YouTube users upload 24 hours of video
They all talk and listen to each other. peer to peer
You can browse the web, update your Facebook, and take and edit videos -- on your phone?
databases can interact with the voice systems - iPhone's Siri was introduced (right) in October 2011.
Why Siri Is a Google Killer
by Eric Jackson
Forbes, October 28, 2011
gone: "telephones", that is, landlines, the circuit-switched analog telephone system
You can't see them. Things that think. Invisible
computers. Devices. A third of the price of a new car is the computer
systems.
Common objects have IP numbers and a full-fledged operating system. They'll be able to listen and speak. Paranoid, anyone?
E-commerce will leak into cell phones, TV remotes, dashboards, refrigerators, and pantries. Buy anything, anywhere, with hardly a second thought -- or no thought at all, using e-commerce agents.
Then information can be sent to and from everything that now has a bar code.
Indeed, the tiny radio
frequency identification (RFID)
chips (greatly magnified on left) are already replacing bar codes. They are becoming attached to many
objects that now have a bar code. You may remember the IBM TV
commercial
from several years ago about the guy who appears to be a shoplifter.
Everything he appears to be stealing by stuffing into his coat has an
RFID chip, so checking out becomes superfluous. So does taking
inventory,
as you can see on the diagram of the warehouse (left). Every box, every
location, and every slot has an RFID chip, aka "smart label".
In capsule form (on a fingertip, right) these chips can be implanted into living creatures. Add in global positioning systems (GPS), and there are going to be many services that bright young people like you can create to make lots of money.
The yellow first-down stripe is an early example of augmented reality that most of us have experienced.
How to See the Invisible
by David Pogue
Scientific American, December 8, 2011
Everyone will have them. They're always on, everywhere, as pervasive as electricity.
Two examples out of thousands:
Huawei and Google Launch the IDEOS (left) - World's First Affordable Smartphone
Downlink speeds of more than 7.2 Mb/s
WCDMA + WiFi dual network support
full mobile broadband services
And here's the kicker: "... also doubles as a WiFi router for up to eight devices at a time."
That's a business model. A "router" in this case is aka a "hotspot".
I take my phone to a place where people can't afford the monthly charge
for mobile broadband services. For a very small fee, they can use my
phone as a mobile hotspot.
Aakash tablets
Sky's the limit for India's $35
tablet
India's $35 laptop hands-on review
Here's the web site the young university students below, all English speakers, will use as their textbook, no fees and no registration required.
MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW)
Those young Indian English speakers are willing to work a whole lot more cheaply than you are because there aren't enough jobs for them in India.
A College Education Without Job Prospects
Which of those skills do you have? How many languages do you speak?
They can share unused capacity.
office and home computers process large batch jobs during off-hours
They can mimic human intelligence to a limited extent.
natural language, learning, self-reproducing robots
iPhone's Siri -- Note the features on the image above right. You say into your iPhone, "Where's the closest Italian restaurant?" and the answer comes back immediately with a map. If the restaurant is smart, they'll add a coupon.
They're easy / natural to use.
?? If you have the patience of Job.
adaptive: speech recognition (Siri), gesture recognition (iPhone, iPad), text-to-speech conversion, language translation, and sensory immersion
digital signatures
courts are accepting digital evidence (right)
ecommerce continues growing
proprietary --> open standards
Who should be setting them?
|