buffalo aerial view
|
spacer

The Reports

ENG 110 - College Writing II - Spring 2012

other pages
welcome | course | essay | case | syllabus

Spring 2012 Countries Project

Refugees and Intercultural Sensitivity

this page

assignments | conferences | oral presentation | essay evaluation form


Class Directory

Doug's email: eng110s12 at gmail.com

Catrina Adrade
Stephanie Cinfio
Kara Craig
Somoina Gacheru
Starrline James
Brittney Ohol
Brittany Pilarski
Ryley Rice
Charlotte Ritchie
Imandeep Singh
Tabitha Soulvie
Cassy Szablewski
Taylor Young
Toya Thomas
Marquise White

up to the top of the page

Assignments

Submit all of them as email. Not an email attachment. You don't have to open Word. Just type it in a text editor (not a word processor) and save it, often. Then copy and paste it into an email to me.

last updated: Feb 3

l = late
/ = partially completed

What does an l mean? I compare the date due below with the date of your email to me.

Absent

Jan 20 - Ryley, Charlotte, Starrline
Jan 23 - Stephanie
Jan 25 - Cassy, Ryley
Jan 27 - Catrina, Brittany P, Ryley, Taylor, Marquise
Jan 30 - Starrline, Singh, Brittney O, Toya
Feb 01 - Starrline
Feb 03 -


due
CaA
StC
KaC
SoG
StJ
BrO
BrP
RyR
ChR
ImS
TaS
CaS
TaY
ToT
MaW




research area approved - country

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
n
y
y
y
y
y
y
y














































diagnostic essay -

compare/contrast -- what's the "worst" country?

Jan 30
y
y
y
y

y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y

























paragraph 1 - culture
Feb 6



















paragraph 2 - music



















paragraph 3 - heritage




















paragraph 4 - economic system




















paragraph 5 - political system




















paragraph 6 - religion 1




















paragraph 7 - religion 2



















paragraph 8 - data summary








































essay 1 explaining why the refugees had to leave



















possible thesis statements




















essay 1 thesis statement approved and discussed



















essay 1 first draft



















essay 1 eval form




















essay 1 final








































essay 2 characterizing your country



















possible thesis statements




















thesis statement approved and discussed



















first draft



















eval form




















final








































Community 101
Dec 9



















due dates missed




















attendance









































up to the top of the page

First Essay


name job title
title of essay
< 15-word description of essay topic
main reader reader's need /
purpose / interest (problem to solve or decision to make)
rhetorical mode organizing principle thesis statement analytical framework / discipline































As we go along, I will add your essays' thesis statements here.

name title < 15-word description compare / contrast essay
thesis statement
process essay
thesis statement
cause / effect essay
thesis statement



     



     




   

85 humboldtConferences

Sign up via email - eng110f11 at gmail.com - first come, first served.

If none of these times is free for you, please let me know and we'll schedule another.

up to the top of the page

Conference 1

dates?? - to discuss your short essay 1

Not signed up - 

in 85 Humboldt (photo on right of the front). You enter from the back; it's the fourth house down the line after Public Safety. I'll be in the 1st floor meeting room, just inside the back door, or in my 2nd floor office.


up to the top of the page

Oral Presentations

how to report: the case page has more info

Oral Presentation


up to the top of the page

Essay Evaluation

Copy and paste the list below into the email with your essay. Give each of the eight items a score from 4 through 0 by applying the standards on the table below. Be prepared to justify that score when we meet to talk about your essay.

- Introduction
- Body
- Conclusion
- Appropriateness of claims/arguments to support thesis
- Appropriateness of evidence
- Awareness of Audience
- Language & style

For your two essays, you do not need to provide a Works Cited section. Instead, as a separate assignment due November 29, send me a Works Cited section with five sources you used in your essays.

- Documentation

Here is an abbreviated version of the scoring system. For each of the item on the list above, give your essay a score from 4 through 0.

 

4

1

0

Organization

Introduction

Captures audience attention in a distinctive engaging way.

Establishes clear & manageable thesis & purpose in an engaging way.

Thesis is located effectively, to allow for smooth transition to the body of essay. 

Attempts to capture audience attention.

Attempts, but does not effectively establish, a focus and purpose.

Thesis present, but may be misplaced.

Does not capture audience attention.

Thesis & purpose not present.

Organization

Body

Presents major points in clear, logical and coherent order.

Transitions, located at the beginning of each body paragraph, clearly reflect the thesis & smoothly guide reader from topic to topic.

Attempts to present major points in logical and coherent order. 

Attempts to provide transitions.

Does not present major points in a logical order.

Does not provide transitions.

Organization

Conclusion

Briefly summarizes main points in an original and reflective way to give a sense of closure.

Reinforces thesis & purpose in a topic specific & reflective way.

Maintains audience attention in a distinctive way.

Attempts briefly to summarize main points.

Attempts to reinforce thesis & purpose.

Does not maintain audience attention

Conclusion not present.


No sense of closure.

Mastery of Topic

Appropriateness of claims/arguments to support thesis  

Each claim/argument directly supports and/or relates to the thesis in an original way.

Each claim/argument is original & valid.

Each claim/argument is clearly & distinctively expressed.

Claims/arguments attempt to supports and/or relates to the thesis.

Some claims/arguments are valid.

Some claims/arguments are expressed.

Thesis-related claims and/or arguments are not present.

Mastery of Topic

Appropriateness of evidence

Evidence clearly & directly supports claims/arguments in an original way.

Evidence is persuasive, that is, sufficient, relevant, valid, reliable, credible

Evidence attempts to support claims/arguments.

Some evidence is insufficient, irrelevant, invalid, unreliable, not credible.

There is no evidence, or evidence is not relevant to claims/arguments.

Evidence is not sufficient, relevant, valid, reliable, credible.

Part or all of the paper is plagiarized.

 

4

1

0

Awareness of Audience

Displays awareness of audience demographics & attitudes in an original way.

Recognizes audience needs.

Meets those needs responsibly & distinctively.

Displays minimal awareness of audience demographics & attitudes & needs.

Overlooks some aspect of meeting those needs.

Displays no awareness of audience demographics & attitudes and needs.

 

Language & style

Uses appropriate grammar & syntax, vocabulary, and mechanics.


Uses ineffective, inappropriate grammar & syntax, vocabulary, and mechanics

Grammar & syntax flawed to the level of incomprehension.

Vocabulary inappropriate.

Incorrect spelling, punctuation, and other mechanics.

Documentation

In the body of the essay, uses parenthetical documentation effectively, that is, smoothly and unobtrusively
 
Uses obscure, awkward, or intrusive documentation.

Applies no documentation style to the essay.

up to the top of the page

Evaluation Criteria

My evaluation system for your writing asks four questions.

content diamond bullet Is it logical, insightful, and visually interesting?
structure diamond bullet Is it easy to follow and learn from?
language diamond bullet Is it written, designed, and presented in an appropriate tone?
mechanics diamond bullet Is it free of error and attractive to look at?

It comes down to this: If I were your boss, I would want to see paper and screen documents that are attractive and accessible. Having your work available when I need it affects the quality component of my assessment. The quality of your writing can be important at raise and promotion time.

These criteria are loaded with ambiguous and subjective terms: easy, appropriate, attractive, good, hard, flair, enthusiasm. Such holistic characterizations come from observations colored by assumptions and prejudices.

For the purposes of giving you feedback in this course, I will use these ideas:

Content

insufficient, irrelevant, invalid, unreliable, incredible <----> sufficient, relevant, valid, reliable, credible

boring <----> interesting, surprising, delightful

misuse of concepts <----> fluent use of concepts 

Structure

puzzling, delaying <----> intuitive 

at the essay, paragraph, and sentence (syntax) levels 

Language

mixed, shaky voice <----> consistent, clear voice

flat, boring voice <----> bright, interesting voice

inaccurate use of vocabulary <----> fluent use of vocabulary 

Mechanics

intrusive (misspelling, inconsistent punctuation, diction etc.) <----> invisible

up to the top of the page

modified: November 2011
by Douglas Anderson
http://toLearn.net/eng110/reports.htm